The Spoken Word
I had one such occasion a few of days ago. There is no
gainsaying I’ll forget about it, I have
not. It is nagging a part of the mind space that has been rendered unavailable for anything else leaving the
biological RAM deficient and slow.
There was this (what I thought) challenging post in a
WhatsApp group that accused people of not finding it worth their while even to
respond, a plea to spare sometime for a
social effort after the New Year Party, leave alone joining, even as there were
tens of messages exchanged on many other trivial topics. I confess I felt
challenged unfairly by this post. I felt a need to respond given the sharp note
in that post. At the moment, the dominant thought in the mind was – it is
unfair to challenge friends in a voluntary group where you exchange
pleasantries, jokes, some info, pictures & videos to make others feel good,
into committing their time & efforts into an activity, with righteous inveigling intended to generate
guilt. Perceiving the barely hidden but unstated accusation of inadequate
commitment to social responsibility here, I felt it my duty to challenge lest
it goes unchallenged. What is the best way to challenge – say yes/ say no/ say
who are you to ask me/ say why should I have to say yes or no ?
At the moment, I wasn’t ready to respond with any of these
though, the instinctive feel was veering
towards the last. It was not the first
and the other two carried the impoliteness about them that I was not ready for.
But the mind was made up on a response, whatever it be. It worked towards an
expression that implied the last but cannot be held to have implied so. A
convenient method the mind has adapted occasionally earlier, is to bring in an
expression of self denial of some sort. This has the comfort that it silences
others as there cannot be a combative response to an expression of self denial.
It also leaves me with a feeling of superiority and what causes it ? A sense
that this expression would leave an unpleasant feel bordering on guilt in the
perpetrator. Emotional sophistry, if I
may. The strategy rolled out again and I
posted ‘Given what is all being demanded, I will follow Ram and henceforth
avoid saying anything in this group.’ Ram, of course, is my pseudonym for another
friend in the group who had been active earlier but has become totally quiet
now. His silence was the result of an acrimonious exchange in which people of
his kind were called sanctimonious dishing out gyan sitting in their ivory
towers far away from the scene and hence less patriotic, or something to that
effect. That it was the same friend who
made the ascription at both the instances gave me a precedence to quote.
It did not end there. The time that followed did not leave
me in peace, somewhere in the back of the mind was an itch to elaborate
vigorously to any aggressive/ pained responses. Alongside was a lurking
suspicion that ‘foot in the mouth’ disease had set in.
That there was no response at all ensured that the itch wore
itself out, but still no peace. How I wished there was some response!! It
might’ve helped me indulge a little more and sprout wisdom. in A new question
arose – why did I say what I did and further what was the compulsion to say
anything at all ? The barb was not directed at me in particular, none else, not
even some who could have felt more challenged than me, had responded before me
or later. Was it to display righteous indignation and hence establish some kind
of moral superiority ? Was it to announce my presence?
A confession that the answer is vaguely positive to all
these questions is the first thing in order. That that is not reconciled yet is
the question that irrespective of my motives, isn’t it necessary to challenge
such abrasive behaviour online ? Silence in response may be a strategy indicating
studied ignorance, but can’t it also be taken to be tolerance or even
acquiescence ? Didn’t the great Einstein say ‘ World is a dangerous place to
live not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don’t
do anything about it’ ?
Then the left brain said –as always in a situation, there
can be an instinctive response, a weak response, a strong response, measured
and deliberate response or no response. How you respond is based on the context of the stimulus, the content
& tone and the state of the receiver’s mind. A post that is provocative but
not addressed to any one in particular, expects a reposte but escapes the
burden of specific target. In as much,
it is a broadcast announcing the writer’s intent to poke people into action or
provoke people into a discussion. And a cry for recognition.
More the ingesta chewed, clearer it became to the mind that
my position and motives were not really different from those of the friend
whose post got my goat in the first place. I wanted to stand out taking a
position, provoke responses and grab attention – the same motives that are
easily ascribed to him. What the great man certainly practiced was – don’t take
yourselves too seriously, even if he didn’t say as much. Well, given what he
was, whatever he said had be more profound, like this.
The realisation that the rest of the people saw this, ignored
both the posts and possibly chuckled in the privacy of their anonymity quietened
the mind releasing the preoccupied mind space for other more current thoughts. There
is 24*7 reality TV, commonly known as news channels, that ensures that there is
always something current, very helpful when the RAM in flesh at the top has
space to spare. The lingering thought is, this is not going to be their last
chuckle at my cost.